Surely, in a game of hockey, even if you don't think it should be allowed to beat your opponent into a pulp with the hockey stick it is foolish to not follow the rule if it is already in place.
One side does everything in its power to win, including foul play, but the other doesn't. Who wins in the long run? Game theory already answers, tit for tat is a great strategy. The right has a lot of tit to give for leftoid tats.
The lack of moralizing ideology to justify foul play has been extremely detrimental in the long run. As a matter of fact, if the right used the state to try to screw the left we'd have a much better chance.
So which is it now, would the one side doing everything in its power to win come out on top, all else held equal, or wouldn't it? If it would win, wielding state power can obviously make the right win and your one-liner is misleading. The right shouldn't be afraid to use power and moralizing ideology to screw the left
It's not wrong to use state power to benefit white christian civilization at the detriment of islam, thus, i support a burka ban. Kulturkampf!
Even if it risks our freedom in the long term?
Surely, in a game of hockey, even if you don't think it should be allowed to beat your opponent into a pulp with the hockey stick it is foolish to not follow the rule if it is already in place.
I doubt whether the state that caused the misery can solve it.
One side does everything in its power to win, including foul play, but the other doesn't. Who wins in the long run? Game theory already answers, tit for tat is a great strategy. The right has a lot of tit to give for leftoid tats.
The lack of moralizing ideology to justify foul play has been extremely detrimental in the long run. As a matter of fact, if the right used the state to try to screw the left we'd have a much better chance.
So which is it now, would the one side doing everything in its power to win come out on top, all else held equal, or wouldn't it? If it would win, wielding state power can obviously make the right win and your one-liner is misleading. The right shouldn't be afraid to use power and moralizing ideology to screw the left
The ends justify the means?
Surely losing in the iterated prisoners dilemma doesn't justify the ends of "being moral" by some arbitrary definition.